Democratic Audit - Human Rights Centre

Home

Auditing Democracy

Breaking News

British Democracy

Media

About Us

Issues

Our Blog

Feedback

Useful Links

Sitemap
 
News update: Stuart Wilks-Heeg has been appointed as Democratic Audit's new Director's. For further details, please click here.

Democratic Audit is an active research organisation which audits democracy and human rights in the UK and internationally. We are a consortium of scholars, lawyers and others. We often work with partners in mature and developing democracies to assess the quality of their democratic arrangements.

AUDITING DEMOCRACY click here
This site contains a robust and sensitive framework for auditing democracy in any country in the world which anyone can use either to conduct a full or part audit

 Director's blog - 1 July 2009

Stuart Wilks-Heeg has posted a new blog Localism: the new politics of old

'What are European Elections For?': new Democratic Audit report, 3 June

Democratic Audit has published a new report, 'What are European Elections for?', to tie in with the 4th June European Parliament elections. It considers the continued existence of a democratic deficit in the EU; the possibility of small parties including the BNP making gains; and what a presence in the European Parliament means for small parties. The report includes projections of the outcomes based on different possible swings in the vote, at a time when voting preferences appear to have become highly volatile. These projections show that swings of support between, and away from, the main parties could impact significantly on which parties represent UK voters in the European Parliament.

For the executive summary,
click here. Full the full report, click here. For the statistical appendix including vote projections, click here.


For press and media enquiries please call Daniel Harris or Jim Minton on 020 7793 4038 or 07989 309058

'What are local elections For?': a Democratic Audit review, 4 June

To complement our guide to the June 4th European elections, Democratic Audit has published a review of the democratic qualities of local elections, with a particular focus on the county council elections taking place on the same day. Noting that local elections tend to have a greater impact on national politics than on local government, this review  asks what the purpose of local elections is, whether there is evidence to suggest that local elections serve this purpose and, if not, what can be done to ensure that they do. Using the established Democratic Audit criteria, it highlights ten specific problems with English local elections and makes the case for urgent, and radical, reforms to revitalise local democracy.

To download the review, click here.

BREAKING NEWS click here

Local and London democracy - Committee on Standards in Public Life Evidence Submission, June 2009

Democratic Audit has submittted evidence to the Committee on Standards in Public Life inquiry into 'Local Leadership and Public Trust: Openness and Accountability in Local and London Government'.

The inquiry has been temporarily postponed so that the Committee can concentrate on its inquiry into MPs' expenses.

Click here to download.

The Cabinet Office and UK Democracy - Evidence Submission, May 2009

Democratic Audit has submitted, in conjunction with Prof. George Jones, evidence to the House of Lords Constitution Committee Inquiry into the Cabinet Office. It argues that recent institutional changes at the centre of government have served to undermine the principle of collective Cabinet government, raising serious questions about the effectiveness of government and how it may be made subject to democratic accountability.

Click here to download.

Decentralisation and Fiscal Autonomy - The Guardian, February 2009

Stuart Wilks-Heeg, Director of Democratic Audit, has had a letter published in the Guardian about the Conservative agenda for decentralisation. It argues that while Conservative proposals are uncontroversial and could command cross-party support, they sidestep the major issue of the need for local fiscal autonomy.

Click here to read.

Report archive

Democratic Audit has published in recent years a number of reports which continue to have relevance in the light of recent renewed impetus for the constitutional reform movement, with all three main parties committed in theory to substantial change. They include:

Power and Participation in Modern Britain - New Report, February 2008

How are decisions really made in the UK, and by whom? In the light of the government's Governance programme for democratic reform, an understanding of who wields power and who participates in political processes is more important than ever. Democratic Audit publishes today the findings of its detailed overview of the landscape. It finds some cause for optimism, for instance an upsurge of popular campaigning, some of it web-based. But there remain huge and growing power divides, with members of underprivileged social and economic groups unable to make their voices heard by the overcentralised UK state.

Click here to download.

Hard-copies can be obtained by sending a £12.50 cheque payable to 'Democratic Audit' to Democratic Audit, Denmore Lodge, Brunswick Gardens, Cambridge, CB5 8DQ. 

A World of Difference: Parliamentary oversight of external policy condemned. 17/12/07: Democratic Audit, One World Trust and Federal Trust publish today 'A World of Difference', a report condemning the ineffectiveness of Parliament in overseeing foreign policy during the 2006-7 session; and making reform proposals. Read our press release or download report here.

Here are summaries of key Audit research on urgent democratic issues in the UK:

  1. The government's 'tough' counter terrorism laws, practice and rhetoric will encourage and assist 'home-grown' terrorism.

  2. Foreign and EU policy has profound effects on everyday life in the UK but is beyond democratic control.

  3. Are we on the brink of reforms to make going to war subject to some parliamentary control?

  4. The British National Party is stronger than you may think.
THE STATE OF BRITISH DEMOCRACY click here
Gordon Brown is planning for a new constitution for the UK. David Cameron, who may be the next Prime Minister but one, wants a 'British' Bill of Rights. But what is the state of democracy and human rights in Britain? In 'Issues' (see below) we look at key components in the debate. Here we report both on democracy and human rights. Check out:
  1. Social and economic well-being and confidence are essential to an inclusive democracy. We argue that Britain requires enforceable economic, social and cultural rights for everyone in an increasingly divided and unequal society.

  2. Our reviews of democracy and political freedom in the UK, including our major study, 'Democracy under Blair' and two studies of the previous Conservative regime. Our findings are that the Labour government was making limited advances towards improving British democracy up to 2001, but since then it has regressed badly, especially with the unconstitutional and manipulative handling of the decision to invade Iraq.

  3. Foreign, or external, policies deeply affect the everyday lives of the British people, but the public, and even MPs, are largely powerless spectators of government foreign policy-making. We reveal the pre-democratic powers that the then Prime Minister used to go to war and to make the UK Bush's closest ally.

  4. What are the views of the British public on issues of democracy, rights and freedoms? Democratic Audit has collaborated with the Joseph Rowntree Reform trust on the 'State of the Nation' series of polls since 1992.

  5. ManifestoWatch: What pledges did New Labour make on democratic issues in its election manifesto? What pledges did all the other parties make? Read the full summary of all their proposals in our feature, Manifesto Watch.
CURRENT ISSUES FOR BRITISH DEMOCRACY click here
Important issues must be resolved so that our democracy becomes more representative, open and equal. The following items from our archives remain relevant:
  1. The deficiencies of the Freedom of Information regime.

  2. Reform of the House of Lords has dragged on inconclusively for years, largely because the previous Prime Minister obstructed all attempts to make the second chamber either fully or mostly elected, and not a largely appointed chamber. But now reform is promised.

  3. Electoral reform may be on the agenda if there is a hung Parliament after the next election. The danger is that Labour might insist on an electoral system that is even more disproportionate than first-past-the-post. On the eve of elections under the proportionate AMS system in Scotland and Wales, we give some background analysis.

  4. Democratic Audit led the way in revealing and analysing the spread of the quango state and its lack of accountability, even to ministers. Read our analysis here.
OUR BLOG click here
For up-to-date information about matters that concern the Democtratic Audit, please read our blog section >>
RIGHT TO KNOW
One in three requests for official information under the Freedom of Information Act are wholly or partly refused. The chances of success for an initial appeal against refusal are as low as one-in-four. As though such figures are not bad enough, the government plans to weaken the 'right to know' further still.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office is the worst offender for turning down 'right-to-know' requests, failing to respond fully to 70 per cent of the requests it has received. This figure confirms research by Democratic Audit suggesting that the FOI regime is designed to prevent access to significant areas of foreign and defence policy. The Department for Constitutional Affairs, the very department responsible for FOI, is the next worst offender.

Requests for information are falling, but the government has now introduced draft FOI regulations to increase the capacity of ministers to reject applications on the grounds of cost (by now including the time taken in considering the request and consulting internally as costs) and limiting the media and other organisations to four inquiries a year to hinder journalistic and investigative research. The regulations do not allow a public interest test to decisions over disclosure.

Democratic Audit Human Rights Centre